HUKUM LELANG OBYEK HAK TANGGUNGAN TERHADAP HARTA BERSAMA SETELAH PERCERAIAN TANPA PERSETUJUAN ISTRI PUTUSAN No: 25 PK/Pdt/2019
Abstract
Decision Number: 25 PK/Pdt/2019 which is a re-examination of Decision Number: 222 K/Pdt/2017 which determines Zainul Arifin as the winner of the mortgage auction where in the implementation of the credit agreement and binding the mortgage there is an unlawful act where the object of the mortgage is joint property which in its implementation there is no agreement from either side of the wife, but the judge's decision ratifies the object of dispute in the auction that is carried out. So that it raises the question of how the legal provisions provide guarantees for joint assets that are carried out after a divorce that does not share joint assets. How is the validity of the Auction of Mortgage Objects for Joint Assets where one of the parties is not regulated according to laws and regulations. What is the law on the judge's consideration in decision No: 25 PK/Pdt/2019 regarding the auction of mortgage objects carried out by the husband without the wife's consent. Which was finally entitled "Juridical Review of the Execution of Auction Objects Derived from Joint Assets (Study of Decisions) No: 25 PK/Pdt/2019). This type of research is normative legal research, namely research conducted by analyzing written laws from library materials or secondary data and reference materials in the field of law or references in the field of law. The data used to answer the problems in this research is secondary data that comes from library research. The legal provisions for the provision of guarantees for joint assets carried out after divorce that do not share joint assets cannot be carried out if there is no agreement between the divorced husband/wife. The execution of the Mortgage Rights gives authority to the first Mortgage holder to sell the object of the Mortgage on its own power through a public auction and take activities from the proceeds of the sale. The issue of joint property must be carried out in the Religious Courts because both spouses are Muslims and have the authority and authority of the Religious Courts to resolve marital problems in Indonesia. The auction of mortgage rights on joint assets that is carried out is legally valid even without the wife's consent because of the executive power of the mortgage. The good faith committed by the auction winner who needs to be protected in this case excludes the unlawful acts committed by the debtor who negligently did not seek approval from the plaintiff as his ex-wife. It is recommended for husband and wife to immediately carry out the distribution of joint assets so as not to injure the rights of others, then the implementation of mortgage auctions on joint assets must also be carried out carefully. returns where the good faith that was carried out must also apply to the auction seller, where the auction seller is responsible for the goods to be auctioned.
Downloads
References
Cholid Narbuko dan H. Abu Achmadi, 2002, Metodologi Penelitian. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.
Dyah Ochtorina Susanti dan A’an Efendi, 2015, Penelitian Hukum (Legal Research). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Johnny Ibrahim, 2006, Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Cetakan Kedua. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing
Purnama Tiora Sianturi, 2013, Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Pembeli Barang Jaminan Tidak Bergerak Melalui Lelang. Bandung: Mandar Maju.
R. Soetojo Prawirohamidjojo, 2000, Hukum Orang dan Keluarga. Surabaya: Airlangga University Press.
Rachmadi Usman, 2008, Hukum Jaminan Keperdataan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Rochmat Soemitro, 1987, Peraturan dan Instruksi Lelang. Bandung: PT. Eresco.
Rofiq Ahmad, 1998, Hukum Islam di Indonesia, Cet. III. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Rosnidar Sembiring, 2016, Hukum Keluarga Harta-harta Benda Dalam Perkawinan. Medan: PT Rajagrafindo Persada.
Samuel M. P Hutabarat, 2010, Penawaran dan Penerimaan Dalam Hukum Perjanjian. Jakarta: Grasindo.
Soerjono Soekanto dan Sri Mamudji, 1995, Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Subekti, dan Tjitrosudibio, 2006, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (Burgerlijk Wetboek Staatsblad). Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita
Sutarno, 2003,Aspek-Aspek Hukum Perkreditan pada Bank. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Trisadini Prasastinah Usanti dan Leonora Bakarbessy, 2014, Hukum Jaminan. Surabaya: Revka Petra Media.
Wiryono Prodjodikoro, 2006, Asas-Asas Hukum Perjanjian. Bandung: Sumur.
Abraham Lombogia, Pembebanan Hak Tanggungan Atas Harta Bersama Suami Dan Isteri Dihubungkan Dengan UU No. 1 Tahun 1974, Lex Privatum, Vol.II, No. 3,Agustus-Oktober 2014.
Hartini, Pengecualian Terhadap Penerapan Asas Ultra Petitum Partum dalam Beracara di Pengadilan Agama” Jurnal Mimbar Hukum, Vol. 21 No. 2 Juni 2009, Yogyakarta, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gajah Mada, 2009.
Kitab Undang- Undang Hukum Perdata
Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 tentang Peraturan Dasar Pokok-pokok Agraria.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 4 Tahun 1996 Tentang Hak Tanggungan Atas Tanah Beserta Benda-Benda Yang Berkaitan Dengan Tanah.
Undang-Undang Nomor 10 Tahun 1998 tentang Perbankan.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 7 Tahun 1989 Tentang Peradilan Agama
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 9 Tahun 1975.Tentang Pelaksanaan Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan.
Instruksi Presiden Nomor 1 Tahun 1991 tentang Kompilasi Hukum Islam.
Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Republik Indonesia Nomor 213/Pmk.06/2020 Tentang Petunjuk Pelaksanaan Lelang.
Vendu Reglement Staatblad. 1940-56 jo Staatblad. 1941
Surat Edaran Nomor 4 Tahun 2016 Tentang Pemberlakuan Rumusan Hasil Rapat Pleno Kamar Mahkamah Agung Tahun 2016 Sebagai Pedoman Pelaksanaan Tugas Bagi Pengadilan Rumusan Hukum Kamar Perdata Perdata Umum Nomor 4 Dimana Disebutkan Kriteria Pembeli Yang Beritikad Baik Yang Perlu Dilindungi Berdasarkan Pasal 1338 Ayat (3) Khuperdata
Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor: 25 PK/Pdt/2019
Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor: 222 K/Pdt/2017
