ANALISIS YURIDIS HAK PATEN SEBAGAI OBJEK JAMINAN FIDUSIA DI INDONESIA DAN SEBAGAI OBJEK JAMINAN PERBANKAN DI SINGAPURA
Abstract
Indonesia and Singapore have ratified TRIPs, which is an international agreement on IPR to be enforced in the national legal concepts of each country. Indonesia established its laws and regulations, namely Law no. 13 of 2016 concerning Patents and Singapore make it happen through the Singapore Patent Act Chapter 221 and in the Indonesian Patent Law Article 108 provides an opportunity for inventors to make the rights to the patent as an object of fiduciary guarantee. The Singapore government has realized the legal action as an object of guarantee that by approving the Masai Group company as the patent holder. This type of research is normative legal research, namely research conducted by analyzing written laws from library materials or secondary data and reference materials in the field of law or references in the field of law. The data used to answer the problems in this research is secondary data that comes from library research. The position of patent rights as objects must be in accordance with the objectives and functions of the law in the formation of laws and regulations both philosophically, sociologically and juridically. UU no. 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Guarantees defines movable intangibles as objects of fiduciary security, while Law no. 13 of 2016 concerning Patents provides an explanation that the right to a patent is in the form of a patent certificate which is an intangible movable object and should be used as an object of fiduciary guarantee to provide legal certainty and the effectiveness of the law. Several inhibiting factors are the existence of implementing regulations which in this case have not yet been issued, the absence of an appraiser (appraiser) and the absence of a financing scheme. The Singapore government has realized the patent as a guarantee, this is because there is already a financing scheme and an appraiser service party to determine the value. The need for legal protection for patent holders so that more patents are created and more inventions occur, so that the country is more advanced.
Downloads
References
-------------. 2016. Mencari dan Menjadi Hukum Indonesia (Refleksi Pemikiran Prof. Mahadi). Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada.
Apeldoorn, van L.J. 1960. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Noor Komala.
Campbell, Henry. 1968. Black’s Law Dictionary. St. Paul, Minn: West Publishing Co.
Direktorat Jenderal Hak Kekayaan Intelektual, Rancangan Undang-Undang Tentang Merek, https://www.bphn.go.id/data/documents/na_ruu_tentang_merek.pdf, diakses pada tanggal 12 Maret 2020, pukul 14.05 WIB.
Hariyani, Iswi., dkk. 2018. Hak Kekayaan Intelektual sebagai Jaminan Kredit. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.
HS, Salim. 2014. Perkembangan Hukum Jaminan di Indonesia. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
HS, Salim., dan Erlies Septiani Nurbaini. 2017. Penerapan Teori Hukum pada Penelitian Tesis dan Disertasi. Jakarta: Rawajali Pers.
Ibrahim, Johny. 2005. Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Malang: Banyu Media.
Irawan, Candra. 2011. Politik Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Indonesia. Bandung: Mandar Maju.
Jayanto, Dewi Asri. Kajian Yuridis Terhadap Merek Sebagai Jaminan pada Lembaga Perbankan. Vol 32, November 2017.
Kamello, Tan. 2014. Hukum Jaminan Fidusia, Suatu Kebutuhan yang Didambakan, Sejarah, Perkembangannya, dan Pelaksanaannya dalam Praktik Bank dan Pengadilan. Bandung: PT. Alumni.
Kamello, Tan., dan Isna. 2021. Hukum Perdata, Hukum Benda dan Perkembangannya. Medan: CV. Kencana Emas Sejahtera.
Kemenkumham, Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, Naskah Akademik RUU tentang Perubahan Atas UU RI Nomor 13 Tahun 2016 tentang Paten, https://www.bphn.go.id/data/documents/na_paten.pdf, diakses pada tanggal 23 Mei 2020 pukul 19.00 WIB.
Kesowo, Bambang. 1998. GATT,TRIPs dan Hak Atas Kekayaan Intelektual (HAKI), Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung RI.
Kitab Undang- Undang Hukum Perdata.
Lumbantoruan, Henry Donald. 2017. Penyelesaian Sengketa Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Melalui Acara Cepat, Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, Vol. 17, No. 1, Maret 2017.
Narbuko Cholid dan H. Abu Achmadi, 2002, Metodologi Penelitian. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.
Nasution, Rahmi Jened Parinduri. 2013. Interface Hukum Kekayaan Intelektual dan Hukum Persaingan (Penyalahgunaan HKI). Jakarta: Rajawali Pres.
Paluppi, Trias. Kekayaan Intelektual sebagai Jaminan Kredit Perbankan. Jurnal Negara Hukum. Vol. 8. No. 1, Juni 2017.
Papang, Aili. 2020. Pemberian Kredit dengan Jaminan Fidusia Hak Paten. Bandung: Alumni.
Peraturan Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia Nomor 25 Tahun 2021 tentang Tata Cara Pendaftaran, Perubahan, dan Penghapusan Jaminan Fidusia.
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 21 Tahun 2015 tentang Tata Cara Pendaftaran Jaminan Fidusia dan Biaya Pembuatan Akta Jaminan Fidusia.
Purnomo Soecipto, Sekretariat Kabinet Republik Indonesia, Mengapa Undang-Undang Perlu Peraturan Pelaksana, https://setkab.go.id/mengapa-undang-undang-perlu-peraturan-pelaksanaan/, diakses pada tanggal 10 Desember 2021 pukul 09.00 WIB.
Purwaningsih, Endang. 2005. Perkembangan Hukum Intellectual Property Rights. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
Safa’at, Muchamad Ali. 2014. Anotasi Pemikiran Hukum. Malang: UB Press.
Saidin, OK. 2019. Aspek Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (Intellectual Property Rights). Depok: PT. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Sunggono, Bambang. 2016. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: PT. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Susanti, Dyah Ochtorina dan A’an Efendi, 2015, Penelitian Hukum (Legal Research). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
TRIP’s Agreement ( Agreement on Trade-Related Aspect of Intellectual Property Rights).
Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2106 tentang Paten.
Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 tentang Jaminan Fidusia.
Utrecht, E., dan Moh. Saleh Djindang. 1983. Pengantar dalam Hukum Indonesia. Jakarta: PT. Ichtiar Baru.
WIPO, Patents, https://www.wipo.int/patents/en/, diakses pada tanggal 14 juni 2020, pukul 11.00 WIB.
Yulia. 2015. Modul Hak atas Kekayaan Intelektual. Sulawesi: Unimal Press.
