DETERMINATION OF SUSPECT TOWARD WITNESS THAT PROVIDED INFORMATION IN CRIMINAL TRIALS: EXPANSION OF THE AUTHORITY OF JUDGES

  • Ratu Ayu Ramadhanty Universitas Pancasila
  • Yasmirah Mandasari Saragih University Pembangunan Panca Budi Medan
  • Rocky Marbun Universitas Pancasila

Abstract

This research is based on the power of the judiciary through the implementation of the main functions and duties of the judge to resolve a case submitted to him as well as to uphold the law and provide justice. The method used in this research is normative legal research with data sources obtained from primary legal materials, namely laws and regulations and secondary legal materials, namely books, legal journals, results of scientific research, and opinions of experts. The data obtained was then processed and analyzed using a qualitative descriptive method, namely by describing the data in the form of regular, coherent, logical, and effective sentences so as to facilitate understanding and interpretation of the data and describing the data in the form of sentence descriptions. The results of the study show that the Criminal Procedure Code has been perfected by the existence of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 21/PUU-XII/2014 which explains that the conditions for determining a suspect must be based on at least 2 (two) pieces of evidence as stipulated in Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code and accompanied by an examination of potential suspects.


 

References

Indonesia, Peraturan Kepala Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 06 Tahun 2019 tentang Penyidikan Tindak Pidana.
Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 18 Tahun 2013 tentang Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Perusakan Hutan, Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2013 Nomor 130, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2013 Nomor 5432.
Kasim, Ramadhan, dan Apriyanto Nusa, Hukum Acara Pidana, (Jawa Timur: Setara Press, 2019).
Liwe, Immanuel Christophel, “Kewenangan Hakim Dalam Memeriksa Dan Memutus Perkara Pidana Yang Diajukan Ke Pengadilan” dalam Lex Crimen (Volume III Nomor 1, Januari-Maret 2014).
Nurdin, Boy, Kedudukan Dan Fungsi Hakim Dalam Penegakkan Hukum Di Indonesia, (Bandung: PT. Alumni, 2012).
Putra, Panca Sarjana, “The Antinomy Of Value In Determining A Suspect By A Judge: An Anachronism In The History Of Human Rights”, Prosiding ICEHHA, Vol. 3, No. 6, Tahun 2021.
Santoso, Tabah, Kewenangan Hakim Pra-peradilan Menetapkan Tersangka Tindak Pidana Korupsi Berdasarkan Kekuasaan Kehakiman, Jurnal Equitable, Vol. 4, No. 1, Tahun 2019
Satriawan, M. Iwan, dan Siti Khoiriah, Ilmu Negara, (Depok: Rajawali Pers, 2017).
Utama, Paku, Buku Informasi - Modul Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP), (Jakarta: KPK, 2021).
Witanto, Darmoko Yuti, dan Arya Putran Negara Kutawaringin, Diskresi Hakim Sebuah Instrumen Menegakkan Keadilan Substantif Dalam Perkara-Perkara Pidana, (Bandung: Alfabeta, 2013).
Published
2023-05-15
How to Cite
RAMADHANTY, Ratu Ayu; SARAGIH, Yasmirah Mandasari; MARBUN, Rocky. DETERMINATION OF SUSPECT TOWARD WITNESS THAT PROVIDED INFORMATION IN CRIMINAL TRIALS: EXPANSION OF THE AUTHORITY OF JUDGES. Proceeding International Conference of Science Technology and Social Humanities, [S.l.], v. 1, p. 423 - 429, may 2023. Available at: <https://jurnal.pancabudi.ac.id/index.php/icesshi/article/view/4564>. Date accessed: 22 may 2024.