DETERMINATION OF SUSPECTS AGAINST VICTIMS OF CRIMINAL ACTS OF THEFT WHO COMMIT FORCED DEFENSE (NOODWEER) IN INDONESIAN CRIMINAL LAW

  • Fitria Ramadhani Siregar Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi
  • Nanang Tomi Sitorus Universitas Medan Area

Abstract

The abolition of crime is divided into two parts, namely those listed in the law and the other being outside the law, introducing jurisprudence and doctrine. The elimination of the crime, namely the forced defense (noodweer) has become a hot topic in the criminal law enforcement process in Indonesia. A forced defense (noodweer) is only carried out when a person feels that he or she is in danger or under threat. However, in some cases, many misunderstood the noodweer defense, so this raises pros and cons. The type of research carried out in this research is normative or doctrinal juridical research aimed only at written regulations and other legal materials. For this reason, this study will discuss the position of forced defense against victims of theft crime who are suspects and the ability to be responsible for victims of theft crimes who are designated as suspects in forced defense.

Author Biographies

Fitria Ramadhani Siregar, Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi

Legal Studies Department

Nanang Tomi Sitorus, Universitas Medan Area

Legal Studies Department

References

Abdulajid, Syawal dan Anshar, Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Komando Militer Pada Pelanggaran Berat HAM (Suatu Kajian dalam Teori Pembaharuan Pidana), Yogyakarta : LaksBang, PRESSindo, 2012

Hamzah, Andi, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2008,

Lamintang, Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2011.

Marpaung, Leden, Asas Teori Praktik Hukum Pidana, Jakarta : Sinar Grafika, 2005.

Moeljatno, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Jakarta, Rineka Cipta, 2008.

__________, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2015.

Nasution, Bahder Johan, Metode Penelitian Ilmu Hukum, Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2008, Riau Law Journal: Vol. 5, No. 2, November (2021), 227-239 239 Prodjodikoro, Wirjono, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia, Bandung : Refika Aditama, 2003

Prokoso, Djoko, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Jakarta : Ghalia Indonesia, 1982. R. Soesilo, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) Serta Komentar-Komentarnya Lengkap Pasal Demi Pasal, Bogor: Politeia, 1993.

Rusianto, Agus, Tindak Pidana dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana, (Tinjauan Kritis Melalui Konsistensi Antara Asas, Teori dan Penerapannya, Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group, 2016.

Waluyo, Bambang, Penelitian Hukum Dalam Praktek, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2008.

Malasa, Landi, Asas Culpa In Causa (Penyebab Kesalahan) Sebagai Pengecualian Terhadap Pembelaan Terpaksa Menurut Pasal 49 Ayat (1) KUHPidana, Lex Crimen Vol. Viii/No.8/Ags/2019.https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/2679 7/26391. 81

Sengi, Ernest, Konsep Culpa Dalam Perkara Pidana Suatu Analisis Perbandingan Putusan Nomor 18/Pid.B/2017/Pn.Tobelo, Era Hukum - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum ISSN 0854- 8242 dan e-ISSN 2581-0359, Volumen 17, No. 2, Oktober 2019.

Tabaluyan, Roy Roland, Pembelaan Terpaksa Yang Melampaui Batas Menurut Pasal 49 KUHPidana, Lex Crimen Vol. Iv/No. 6/Ags/2015, https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id /index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/9786
Published
2022-08-31
How to Cite
SIREGAR, Fitria Ramadhani; SITORUS, Nanang Tomi. DETERMINATION OF SUSPECTS AGAINST VICTIMS OF CRIMINAL ACTS OF THEFT WHO COMMIT FORCED DEFENSE (NOODWEER) IN INDONESIAN CRIMINAL LAW. Proceeding International Conference Keputeraan Prof. H. Kadirun Yahya, [S.l.], v. 1, n. 1, p. 369-373, aug. 2022. ISSN 2961-7960. Available at: <https://jurnal.pancabudi.ac.id/index.php/keputeraan/article/view/4422>. Date accessed: 15 july 2024.